Frequent Objections to Theistic Evolution
Over the years since I first accepted the theory of evolution, I have been asked many questions about my belief and its compatibility with Christianity. A few of these questions are new and challenging, but many of them are either repetitive, or very similar to questions I have answered previously. Of course, I mean that they are repetitive to me, not to those who ask them.
This FAQ, or response to frequent objections, is designed to provide the person who is honestly examining the various viewpoints with answers to major objections that are commonly provided. I will deal here with the relationship of theistic evolution to views such as old earth creationism, young earth creationism, and intelligent design.
I hope these answers are helpful. Remember as you read them that each is a short answer to the question. Details will be dealt with under individual questions. I also provide links to previous articles and blog entries that I have written, as well as to other sources following each question.
This FAQ is specifically about theistic evolution. While I will provide definitions and basic information about evolutionary theory in order to talk about it, I'm writing specifically about the interaction of theology and evolutionary theory. I will provide links to other sources of good information about evolution on the web.
For general information on creation and evolution, see my Creationism vs Evolutionism directory.
Directory
Objections and Answers
| | | | | Objection #1: Theistic evolution cannot be true because it ignores the way the Bible says God created the earth.
| This objection is generally stated incorrectly, implying that theistic evolutionists simply ignore the Genesis story of creation. To be more precise, theistic evolution does not deny Genesis. Rather, it denies a specific interpretation of Genesis.
Let me be clear that the response "that's just your interpretation" is not an adequate response to this objection. Rather, I mean that the issue is not whether one person or another cares what the Bible has to say, but what each person thinks the Bible means.
See the links below for a discussion of interpretation and how it applies to evolution and origins.
| | Related Links: | | | | | | Objection #2: How can you accept the theory of evolution and also believe in God? Isn't the theory of evolution essentially atheistic?
| | The theory of evolution is simply a scientific theory explaining how life on earth has diversified. It does not comment on whether or not God exists. Certain advocates of this theory in popular literature connect it with atheism, oddly enough from both the atheistic and fundamentalist Christian sides of the debate, claim that theism and evoluiontary theory are incompatible. It is, in fact, incompatible with certain subsets of Christian belief, such as a reading of Genesis as narrative history, but there are many forms of theism, including Christian theism, that are compatible.
| Related Links: | | | | | | Objection #3: What is young earth creationism?
| Young earth creationism is the belief that the universe was created in six literal days (with the seventh set aside for rest) 6,000 (or so) years ago. (Some adherents to the young earth position will allow up to 10,000 years.) In general, YECs also accept a literal, worldwide flood based on Genesis 6-9.
Though many claim a scientific basis for this belief, in fact it is primarily the result of a particular style of Biblical interpretation. In particular, adherents take the first 11 chapters of Genesis both literally and as narrative history.
Opponents tend to depart from either the literal meaning or the genre of the literature claimed by YECs. | | Related Links: | | | | | | Objection #4: What is old earth creationism?
| | Old earth creationists accept the scientifically determined age of the earth and of the universe, but believe that God created over periods of time. They hold that even though the creation happened over periods of time, God nonetheless specially created invidual "types" of creature.
Often old earth creationists will also hold that the flood was a localized event, more of a civilization destroying flood than one that spanned the entire globe. | Related Links: | | | | | | Objection #5: What is the gap theory? What is ruin and restoration creationism?
| Unlike young earth creationism, the ruin and restoration theory holds that the earth and the universe are old, but unlike the old earth creationists they believe that the Genesis creation did occur in 6 literal days. They believe that previous creations have existed, and were destroyed by God's judgment before the Genesis 1 creation.
They believe that Genesis 1:1 describes that earlier creation, then Genesis 1:2 should be translated "the earth became formless and empty" while the movment of the Spirit of God in Genesis 1:2 is the beginning of this new creation. | | Related Links: | | | | | | Objection #6: How can we identify the intelligent designer in ID arguments?
| | The intelligent design movement says that the intelligent designer need not be God. This is one element of their argument that ID is not religious in nature. Nonetheless, while any particular case of intelligent design might be explained by a variety of intelligent agents, ultimately, much like the "uncaused cause" we must come to a designer who is not part of the natural world, otherwise nothing has been explained. | Related Links: | | | | | | Objection #7: What elements do you believe should be part of a Biblical doctrine of creation?
| The Bible discusses creation in a number of contexts, and from these we can get some essentials of a Biblical doctrine. I believe that the key is the belief that God is the ultimate creator. There are several other elements:
- God is the creator of everything (Genesis 1:1-2:4a, Psalm 104:24, Hebrews 1:2, Romans 11:33-36)
- God creates by simple command so His word is certain (Psalm 33:6-9)
- God put personal care into creation (Genesis 2:4b-25)
- Human beings were created in God’s image (Genesis 1:27), they were good (Genesis 1:31), and later they fell from that state (Genesis 3)
- God created wisely (Psalm 104:24, Proverbs 8:22-31)
- God continuously cares for His creation (Psalm 104, Acts 17:26-29)
| | Related Links: | | | | | | Objection #8: Could you recommend some books I can read on [fill in particular view of creation here]?
| | I do recommend certain books on each of the major views. You should be aware as you read any of my lists that I have my own position, and may not select the same books as an advocate of each position would.
See the first link for my short list. | Related Links: |
|
|
|
Most Current Post
Literary Types in Genesis 1-11 (Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 19:26:41 +0000)
Pardon me for using “types” where “genre” would be more precise, but I frequently do so in teaching in order to avoid having to explain details. Further, “genre” doesn’t maintain the same meaning across all critical disciplines.
In my previous post on the historicity of Genesis 1-11, I wrote as though one could establish a [...]
Previous Posts
- Literary Types in Genesis 1-11 (Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 19:26:41 +0000)
- Historicity of Genesis 1-11 (Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 15:01:19 +0000)
- The Myth of the Absent Husband (Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 19:43:45 +0000)
- Of Trees, Forests, and Bible Study (Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 00:29:34 +0000)
- Genesis 11: Deterioration and Separation (Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 02:13:38 +0000)
- Rightly Dividing or Slicing and Dicing - Jeremiah 4:23 (Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 21:29:38 +0000)
- Genesis 10: The Table of Nations (Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2007 22:12:42 +0000)
- Genesis 9: A New World (Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 22:42:26 +0000)
- Reflecting on the Flood (Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2006 21:30:19 +0000)
- Genesis 6:5-8: Cause of the Flood (Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:24:26 +0000)
|
Most Current Post
Evolution as God?s Tool (Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 19:38:54 +0000)
A post on the Panda’s Thumb today calls attention to this post from Uncommon Descent, which claims that theistic evolutionists must believe contradictory things:
I would not have a problem understanding evolution as God?s ?creation tool,? if TEs conceived of evolution as a ?tool? in the strict sense. A tool in the strict sense is [...]
Previous Posts
- Evolution as God?s Tool (Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 19:38:54 +0000)
- Are Creationists Stupid? (Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 13:01:27 +0000)
- Joe Carter?s 10 Ways Darwinists Help ID (Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:14:37 +0000)
- Book: Evolution and Christian Faith (Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2008 01:51:46 +0000)
- Expelled! and the Atheism-Evolution Connection (Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 19:13:50 +0000)
- Suppressed and Talking about it Everywhere (Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 14:31:03 +0000)
- Why I Quit Trusting Creationist Writers (Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:52:40 +0000)
- From YEC to Theistic Evolutionist (Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 23:00:57 +0000)
- On the Processes of Science (Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:23:05 +0000)
- Panic in the Temple of Darwin? (Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 21:00:00 +0000)
|
|
|
Jody's daily devotional goes out via e-mail every weekday morning.
You can find these via the blog, Jody's Devotionals, where you can subscribe via RSS or e-mail.
|
Blogs |
Threads from Henry's Web Thoughts on Religion in the world |
Participatory Bible Study Blog How-to articles and Bible studies |
Pacesetters Bible School Newsletter Pacesetters Bible School news and articles |
The Jevlir Caravansary Fiction book reviews, poetry, short stories |
|